http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > Also, perhaps to make the change conservative enough for 4.9, might be best > to not append anything now, and only look at DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN (recurse > on it) if !DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC. More verbose printing can be perhaps > deferred for stage1. I agree, mostly because... (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #13) > It is not clear to me why you want to print <clone> at all. It is an > internal detail. ...just printing "<clone>" really provides fairly little value. If we (hopefully from the next version on) manage to print details about properties of the particular clone, it will become useful.
