http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #15) > Thus, I'm fine with closing this for the regressions but not exactly for the > issue in comment #5 for which the bug was opened; FWIW, I actually meant "for which the bug was kept open". Anyways, with the title change and none of us having sufficient interest and resources, I suggest re-closing this PR. I will do this myself in a week, assuming I remember and no-one else takes action.
