https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61315
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #5) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > Still does not matter, the compiler is broken and should be reported to > > Apple. The time for work around in broken compilers is so 90s and really > > should not be done. This is clang being broken and really should be fixed > > there instead. > > Is the object here to burn all bridges with the darwin target and leave > those users only the option of using llvm based compilers as of gcc 4.10? Well they burned a bridge with saying to the user of their front-end they support GNU C when they do not.
