https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61928
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Cahill <kevinecahill at gmail dot com> --- Thanks. That sounds sensible. I will check it. Best wishes, Kevin Kevin Cahill Professor of Physics & Astronomy Physics Dept. 1919 Lomas NE, MSC 07 4220 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 kevinecah...@gmail.com cah...@unm.edu 505 205 5448 On Jul 27, 2014, at 3:10 PM, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61928 > > Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > With you attachment, I am getting this: > > /tmp/ccBACux5.o: In function `dgefa.2334': > pr61928.f90:(.text+0x1282): undefined reference to `idamax_' > /tmp/ccBACux5.o: In function `dgedi.2345': > pr61928.f90:(.text+0x19fa): undefined reference to `dscal_' > pr61928.f90:(.text+0x1aba): undefined reference to `daxpy_' > pr61928.f90:(.text+0x1c2d): undefined reference to `daxpy_' > pr61928.f90:(.text+0x1cbd): undefined reference to `dswap_' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > I did not link this with anything. The four last listed procedures listed are > not defined in the attachment, although used. > > In subroutine dgefa, idamax is defined as an integer. If I delete that line, > the undefined reference to idamax_ goes away. The last four references I > suspect are in the BLAS library that I am not linked to at the moment. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
