https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> --- On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:08:22PM +0000, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188 > > Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to kargl from comment #7) > > > Actually, no. We inspected the function manually looking for the > > > cause of a test FAIL of bessel_7.f90 and just stumbled across it. > > Which would be: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02311.html > > > Committed to trunk and all open branches. > > Steve, should we also add a test case for the "n1 < 0"? > I only looked at the specific issue raised by OP. If calling bessel_yn() with n1 < 0 violates requirements of the standard, then yes we should probably check for that situation. I'll cast an eye over this later today.
