https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #43 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #42) > PR 54699 comes into my mind when seeing the movsf_ie patterns ... having > another movsf_ie pattern is discomforting. But if it makes it work, so be > it. Maybe we can try to combine the two movsf_ie insns later. Sure. It's an experiment to clear the issue further. I'll apply it and the revised untyped_call patch on sh-lra branch.
