https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64039
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed| |2014-11-24 Component|tree-optimization |testsuite Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Summary|FAIL: |[5 Regression] FAIL: |gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse |gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse |-2.c scan-tree-dump |-2.c scan-tree-dump |optimized "return 28;" |optimized "return 28;" Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- a = *L$C0000; ok, so PA has a similar issue as aarch64 (PR63679), I suppose for those targets we need to XFAIL the test (it's a known missed-optimization tracked in that PR). I'll take care of this.