https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> --- On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:13:09PM +0000, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > To conclude I think this PR should be closed as INVALID. > That's the conclusion that I'm leaning towards. Reading section 16 of the standard always makes my head hurt, so I'm being caution while looking for some subtle point that I may have missed.
