https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64274
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > Does the following fix it? > > diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.c b/gcc/fold-const.c > index 7b68bea..34f5a6b 100644 > --- a/gcc/fold-const.c > +++ b/gcc/fold-const.c > @@ -10082,7 +10082,8 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc, > /* Reassociate (plus (plus (mult) (foo)) (mult)) as > (plus (plus (mult) (mult)) (foo)) so that we can > take advantage of the factoring cases below. */ > - if (TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type) > + if (ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) > + && TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type) > && (((TREE_CODE (arg0) == PLUS_EXPR > || TREE_CODE (arg0) == MINUS_EXPR) > && TREE_CODE (arg1) == MULT_EXPR) Yes, thanks. I'll bootstrap this on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf it you'd like
