https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45780
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu> --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2) > > The -Wc90-c99-compat that made it into gcc5 currently warns about > > any usage of bool whatsoever, not just the specific usages of bool > > listed in this bug... > > Right, that was the point of it. ...so is this bug worth keeping open then? It'd seem kinda redundant to me for extra, more-specific warnings about bools to be placed in -Wc90-c99-compat (as was originally proposed), when the flag already prints the more-generalized warnings that it currently does. Or would they get their own separate -Wbool-arith option? If so, what would happen when a user specifies both a hypothetical -Wbool-arith flag along with -Wc90-c99-compat at the same time? I'm just kinda worried that such a situation could lead to duplicated and/or excessive warnings...
