https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-07-03
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marc Di Luzio from comment #3)
> If this is still considered an issue, I would suggest that __carry be copy
> constructed.

No, it needs to be constructed empty, but with the same allocator:

    list __carry(get_allocator());

Unfortunately so does every element of the array __tmp:

    list __tmp[64] = { get_allocator(), get_allocator(), get_allocator(),...

Reply via email to