https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67716
Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-09-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #9)
> Created attachment 36395 [details]
> reduced test case
>
> This one fails with the same asm error with my sh-elf c++ for -g -O1.
Yep, I get this, too. There should be an ".align 1" after the table. Or maybe
".align 2" is even safer?
It's strange ... when compiling with -O1 but without -g I get this:
.long ___divdi3
.align 2
.L4:
.byte .L3-.L5 // aligned
.byte .L2-.L5 // unaligned
.byte .L2-.L5 // a
.byte .L2-.L5 // u
.byte .L6-.L5 // a
.byte .L2-.L5 // u
.byte .L6-.L5 // a
.byte .L2-.L5 // u
.byte .L2-.L5 // a
.byte .L2-.L5 // u
.byte .L7-.L5 // a
.L3:
mov.l .L16,r1 // u
but AS does not output an error message.
