https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67716
--- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #13) > (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #12) > > Maybe we should move some > > more of the sh_option_override things sh_override_options_after_change? I > > don't know ... > > I thought the same thing too. From the implementations for other targets, > the align related flags are enough, I guess. I could be wrong, though. Yes, there are issues. I've created PR 67723.
