https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68095
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Let me put it differently. At the C level, your asm statement outputs to an integer register. Internally, the asm outputs to a condition reg, and the C statement is expanded to also do a move from that condition reg to the integer register. This move is then later optimised away in your example. On "cc0" targets, every asm has an implicit "cc" clobber. x86 is not a cc0 target (that is ancient technology and one day it will be gone completely, hopefully). However, it used to be a cc0 target long ago, and to ease transition of old user code, the target code adds a cc clobber always. If you look at the generated RTL (with -da, say), you will see that the cc output overrides the cc clobber. There is no conflict.
