https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69205
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Known to fail| |6.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Here is a short testcase without any use of includes:
struct string{};
template<typename _Signature> class function;
template<typename _Res, typename... _ArgTypes> class
function<_Res(_ArgTypes...)>{};
template<typename ActionType, typename... Cols>
void print_action(function<ActionType*(Cols..., ActionType)> action_factory)
{}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
function<string*(int, string)> t;
print_action<string, int>(t);
print_action(t);
return 0;
}
--- CUT ---
I don't know variadic templates that well to know enough so I can't comment one
way or another.
