https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070
--- Comment #32 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to neil.n.carlson from comment #31) > Sorry, ignore the example of comment 30. I had already reported this in PR > 67564 (not a duplicate of this one). I'm getting old ... Thanks for your appreciation of my efforts! I was going to attack some of the remaining deferred character issues after a spell of regression fixing. I have taken note of PR67564 and will give it a poke around tonight. Best regards Paul
