https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69537
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69537 > > --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Yeah, in the match.pd hunk there is quite a lot of == INTEGER_TYPE. I bet > ENUMERAL_TYPE can be always handled the same, the question is about > BOOLEAN_TYPE. I refrained from editing the patterns I moved from fold-const.c at the same time as I moved them just to avoid introducing new bugs. You might confuse == INTEGER_CST with == INTEGER_TYPE though as there is only one place with == INTEGER_TYPE in whole match.pd.
