https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69577
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) > IMO, we should revert r215450, and fix a couple of cases using narrowing > conversions with gen_lowpart that were introduced after r215450. Please give me a few days to look at it first. I still think r215450 is correct and reverting it is likely to regress code quality.
