https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14505
Alex Rosenberg <alexr at leftfield dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
--- Comment #4 from Alex Rosenberg <alexr at leftfield dot org> ---
In the new world where C++ constexpr can do this kind of thing, I wonder if
this definition for __builtin_constant_p() is still desirable.
(This bug hasn't been updated in a decade because I was busy working on LLVM
instead.)
Since Clang tries for reasonable compatibility with GCC language extensions
like this, having a more rational definition of __builtin_constant_p() going
forward would be desirable for both compilers.
