https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to David B. Robins from comment #10) > My apologies, I saw the example you pointed at was from torture/ but > missed/forgot that you had also wanted the new test there. I moved the file > to torture and removed -O2 -fno-inline and I didn't get the failure. I did > get it when I added back only -fno-inline, which at least no longer depends > on a specific optimization level: Ok, good. Weird that you don't get it for -O0 but never mind. Since you verified that it works there I think, I'll put it in torture/ hoping I won't forget to remove the "-O2 -fno-inline". :) Just one more question; credits where credits are due: are you ok with me putting your name and email address, as it appears in here in bugzilla, on the entry in the testsuite ChangeLog?
