https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71899
Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> --- I dislike the #ifdef parts. It seems to me both modes of operation could be provided without resorting to the preprocessor. I'm also not a fan of the name boolean_testable - perhaps boolean_like would be better? The rationale being that there are "boolean testable" types that work in cases where a contextual conversion to bool is performed, but those types are otherwise not "boolean-like". Sure, we could go with boolean_testable and potentially contextually_boolean_testable or some such. It seems to me that both of those facilities are useful. I do wonder why we even bother supporting e.g. comparison operators that don't just return bool, although that's in some ways a separate matter.