https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71899
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> --- (In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #2) [..] > I'm also not a fan of the name boolean_testable Note that no-one yet has made an improved name suggestion for this thingee that is discussed in LWG 2743. Unless this happens, I think that the corresponding trait should match this name and should match the intention of what is tested here. > - perhaps boolean_like would > be better? The rationale being that there are "boolean testable" types > that work in cases where a contextual conversion to bool is performed, > but those types are otherwise not "boolean-like". If you believe so, please make a corresponding comment to LWG 2743 and convince people for accepting this revised name.
