https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79039
--- Comment #2 from Carl Love <cel at us dot ibm.com> --- On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 14:29 +0000, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79039 > > Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |carll at gcc dot gnu.org, > | |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > CCing Carl. Carl, be sure to use long long instead of long so that you get 64 > bits on both -m32 and -m64. > Bill: Yes, I see I just have "long" for the last test case. I am compiling the code on willow5 and want to make sure I can reproduce the bug with -m32 and then fix it. I know we didn't test this patch with -m32The popcnt patch that I just posted for review I did do the testing on -m32 and -m64. I would have expected to see the failure on -m32 but didn't so I am a little paranoid, again, that my testing/environment isn't working as well as expected. Carl
