https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2017-07-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think this is a real bug now:
void baz (void);
#define FOO for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
#define BAR \
void bar (void) \
{ \
FOO \
baz (); \
return; \
}
BAR
the warning is fooled because the "body" (baz();) and "next" are coming from
the same expansion, and "guard" isn't.
