https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81677
--- Comment #4 from chris.ol...@iti-global.com --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3) > Because the type doesn't exist, I don't know what you mean by a type that "doesn't exist". A declared but undefined struct is incomplete but exists nevertheless. > neither does a pointer to such a type, as pointer types can only be > derived from types that exist, not from types that don't exist. Are you saying that pointers can't point to incomplete types? That's expressly allowed by pointers. Especially in the case of a member pointing to its own struct.
