https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79997
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2017-08-14
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|tree-optimization |translation
Depends on| |77810
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. There are a few instances of this idiom in the file and elsewhere
in GCC. The pass makes use of the format_warning_at_substring() function to do
the formatting and that function only comes in one form, and doesn't provide an
"overload" similar to warning_n or warning_at_rich_loc_n to format plural forms
of diagnostics (this enhancement request is being tracked in pr77810).
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77810
[Bug 77810] provide format_inform_at_substring to go with
format_warning_at_substring
