https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #20 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #19) > Note you lost the regression marker when this was made a duplicate of 21161. > So it's unlikely anyone would have looked at it until the next release cycle. > > My understanding from Florian is that at least some of the issues here are > regressions, so I've added the marker to 21161. Oops, sorry, thanks for fixing it
