https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #9) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > > That just means r240568 caused another regression. > > Again, on various targets strchr is efficient, just on a few ones it is not > > and the change was unfortunately done generically. > > On practically all targets, including x64, strchr is not as efficient as > strlen. Do you have data to show that?
