https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #15) > I don't think it's safe to compare different benchmark results like that. > But yes the kernel for both should be very similar. The key difference is > that strchr needs 2x the number of comparisons, which is why an optimized > strlen will always be faster than strchr. That is of course not true, it can do e.g. just the number of comparisons strlen needs + 1.
