https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141
--- Comment #37 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Hi Richi, > So the fix quite possibly only papers over the problem in general > - it changes to use a new, non-cached variant in this place but I see > many more callers to gfc_get_dtype. Eventually they will be all for > different types but who knows. The problem of many more callers is exactly what worried me. > I suggest to remove the caching from gfc_get_dtype. Can this Bear-of-Little-Brain ask how this might be accomplished? I fear that the lowering from generic to gimple is something about which I have a very vague grasp. Do I take it that the caching you are referring to is the use of GFC_TYPE_ARRAY_DTYPE if it is there? If it is nothing more subtle/clever than that, I can get on with what is needed :-) Cheers Paul On 8 February 2018 at 12:36, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 > Bug 84141 depends on bug 84155, which changed state. > > Bug 84155 Summary: [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED > Resolution|FIXED |--- > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > You are the assignee for the bug.
