https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jay from comment #3) > The original case said something about "localalias" in the error, so aliases > don't seem to address it. I can dig that up probably. > > Shouldn't it warn for: > if (0) > banned_function() > ? > > I believe we want it to. > You know, strive for equal warnings/errors w/ or w/o optimization, but I > know that is impossible in general, because optimization==analysis. The documentation is explicit here though: " call to such a function is not eliminated through dead code elimination or other optimizations"
