https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10360
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot
com> ---
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, jason at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> The quoted passage in the documentation now reads
>
> ---
> Some machines never actually require alignment; they allow reference to any
> data type even at an odd address. For these machines, @code{__alignof__}
> reports the smallest alignment that GCC gives the data type, usually as
> mandated by the target ABI.
That change (r133271) seems incorrect in this context, as it should be the
alignment given for complete objects.
