https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37200
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> > Confirmed that gcc still prints 2 warnings for the testcase. It's necessary
> > to set the standard manually to c89 or gnu89 now that GCC defaults to
> > -std=gnu11. Now that GCC has carets for its diagnostics, we can see that the
> > 2 warnings actually point to different places:
> >
> > $ /usr/local/bin/gcc -c -std=gnu89 -pedantic 37200.c
> > 37200.c: In function ‘foo’:
> > 37200.c:10:11: warning: initializer element is not computable at load time
> > [-Wpedantic]
> > { (void**) &x->tst }
> > ^
> > 37200.c:10:3: warning: initializer element is not computable at load time
> > [-Wpedantic]
> > { (void**) &x->tst }
> > ^
> >
> > So are they still actually duplicates?
>
> WAITING on a response to this.
No response; I'm going to close this on the reasoning that the carets show that
they're not actually duplicates.
