https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86472
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > > Yes indeed with respect to the declaration of 't'. However, since the > > submodule > > is a separate compilation unit, I believe that it also must contain > > an 'implicit none' to pick up the undeclared variable 'x'. I will check > > the standard on this. > > If I add > > implicit none > real :: x > > I get > > print *,t, a, x > 1 > Error: Symbol 't' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type This points to the underlying problem. Somehow the symbol for 't' is not being harvested from the interface. Cheers Paul
