https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87304

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2018-11-23
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The difference is:
bb-slp-over-widen-1.c:33:1: note:   Vectorizing an unaligned access.
in -mcpu=power8 or on e.g. x86_64 vs.
bb-slp-over-widen-1.c:33:1: missed:   not vectorized: unsupported unaligned
store: *a_116(D)
bb-slp-over-widen-1.c:33:1: missed:   not vectorized: bad data alignment in
basic block.
bb-slp-over-widen-1.c:33:1: note:  removing SLP instance operations starting
from: *a_116(D) = _7;
with -mcpu=power7 or earlier.  So, shall we:
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-over-widen-1.c.jj  2018-11-23
15:42:50.345052674 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-over-widen-1.c     2018-11-23
15:53:41.438334280 +0100
@@ -64,4 +64,4 @@ main (void)
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "demoting int to signed short" "slp2" { target
{ ! vect_widen_shift } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "demoting int to unsigned short" "slp2" {
target { ! vect_widen_shift } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {\.AVG_FLOOR} "slp2" { target vect_avg_qi } } }
*/
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "basic block vectorized" 2 "slp2" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "basic block vectorized" 2 "slp2" {
target vect_hw_misalign } } } */

Reply via email to