https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #16 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Hi Jakub, I don't have access to the source until this evening. You, I think, must be right. I need to use gfc_replace_expr. I'm trying to do many things at once - this PR has been on my conscience (together with others) and so I was a bit too eager to get shot of it. Cheers Paul On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 17:57, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881 > > --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Comment on attachment 45258 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45258 > A slightly more elaborate version of Jakub's patch > > So, what will happen if there is more than one INQUIRY reference? The first > iteration will set *newp to some expression and the next iteration will > overwrite (memory leak) it with something different, so the last one wins? > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > You are the assignee for the bug.
