https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85716
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to sandra from comment #9) > Just to clarify, I didn't have anything to do with proposing a "progress > bar"; I just needed to know whether the split1 pass had run yet. And I > ended up solving that problem by using a property instead of a dynamic pass > numbering thing. Oh, maybe I was thinking of some other thread on the lists then?
