https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
--- Comment #20 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Oh, sorry, I missed that in all the commentary. I had looked at the code and seen the "obvious" problem in the expansion, and noted you had suggested that also. Should have read further. I think that's right, using this is wrong for LE. Jakub, do you want to push that patch, or shall I regstrap it once more and take care of it?