https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71446
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > So, shall we never try ck_list conversion for CONSTRUCTORs with any > designators (while for -std=c++2a we'll complain if there is a mix of > designated initializer clauses and non-designated initializ clauses, I think > we don't diagnose that earlier, so maybe we need to cache it in some > CONSTRUCTOR flag?), or never any conversion but ck_aggr? If there are designated initializers, ck_aggr is the only thing that makes sense.
