https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763
--- Comment #48 from Steve Ellcey <sje at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #47) > What's the state of regressions left? Can we xfail the rest and defer the > bug? I submitted a patch to fix gcc.target/aarch64/lsl_asr_sbfiz.c That email is https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-04/msg00404.html The other regressions I have are: FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c scan-assembler bfi\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, 0, 8 FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c scan-assembler bfi\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, 16, 5 FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c scan-assembler movk\tx[0-9]+, 0x1d6b, lsl 32 I don't have a patch for those.
