https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90263
--- Comment #17 from Wilco <wilco at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #16) > (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #15) > > I just noticed I have been misreading mempcpy as memccpy and so making no > > sense. Sorry about that! Please ignore my comments. > > I see, yes we have too many and the names are too similar. Now all we need > is someone to propose strlpcpy or stplcpy... https://github.com/fishilico/shared/blob/master/linux/nolibc/uname.c Aargh...
