https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #4 from Joel Hutton <joel.hutton at arm dot com> --- Hi Rainer I set up an account with cfarm, and tested on gcc202, the test fails because on SPARC, no constructor is generated, the for whatever reason (see below) making the test not really applicable. I suggest making the test an xfail, so that if at some point in the future SPARC generates a constructor here the test will apply. The other option is to skip it for SPARC. tree output on SPARC at the slp pass: . . . MEM[(char *)d_202 + 25B] = _136; # .MEM_233 = VDEF <.MEM_232> MEM[(char *)d_202 + 26B] = _140; # .MEM_234 = VDEF <.MEM_233> MEM[(char *)d_202 + 27B] = _144; # .MEM_235 = VDEF <.MEM_234> MEM[(char *)d_202 + 28B] = _148; # .MEM_236 = VDEF <.MEM_235> MEM[(char *)d_202 + 29B] = _152; # .MEM_237 = VDEF <.MEM_236> MEM[(char *)d_202 + 30B] = _156; # .MEM_238 = VDEF <.MEM_237> MEM[(char *)d_202 + 31B] = _160; # PT = { D.1522 } (nonlocal, interposable) d_239 = d_202 + 32;