https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #4 from Joel Hutton <joel.hutton at arm dot com> --- > Hi Rainer > > I set up an account with cfarm, and tested on gcc202, the test fails because > on > SPARC, no constructor is generated, the for whatever reason (see below) > making > the test not really applicable. I suggest making the test an xfail, so that if > at some point in the future SPARC generates a constructor here the test will > apply. The other option is to skip it for SPARC. I've just checked gcc-testresults: the test also FAILs on i586-unknown-freebsd11.2, i686-pc-linux-gnu, ia64-suse-linux-gnu, powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.0.0, powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu, and s390x-ibm-linux-gnu. Just adding an ever increasing list of xfail/skip's without really understanding why the test fails or what is common between those targets seems unmaintainable (and thus highly undesirable) to me.
