https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |54367 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > > (In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #1) > > > i believe i've hit the same problem > > > > I don't think so. The original bug report is for 4.9.3, and seems to be an > > actual compiler bug that is fixed already in GCC 5 and later. > > > > Your case is invalid code. While I agree a warning would be nice, it's not > > the same as a bug in 4.9.3 that has been fixed. > > I've created PR 70692 for the missing warning on the invalid code, since > it's a different problem to the one in this PR. ah right, I think this just reminded me of a bug whose number I was trying to remember for a different bug... Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 [Bug 54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions