https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91839
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to tangyixuan from comment #3) > Error handler should not stop at the first error and report the errors as > many as possible. This is not possible in general as the error may cause a cascade of errors that are only "errors" because of the first one. In that case, it is better to stop so that the user knows which error is the actual important one to fix. > Maybe it could be improved at some extent. You are welcome to try: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GettingStarted#Basics:_Contributing_to_GCC_in_10_easy_steps GCC will always need more contributors and you are very welcome to contribute in this area if it is interesting for you. However, existing GCC developers should better spend their time on other more important bugs or features.