https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92956
Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Last reconfirmed| |2019-12-17
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> -Wstringop-overflow is a C-family only option that shouldn't be enabled for
> Fortran. It took some effort to make it work that way (see pr80545 for the
> background) and there's no test for it so either the logic put in there
> still isn't correct or something has regressed.
I don't have time right now to read up the history/rationale behind that
(enabling a generic? middle-end warning only for certain source languages), but
I'll note that -- as we've seen in PR92952 -- it's actually useful in other
scenarios, too? (And if only to make the analysis' code more robust.)
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> Thanks! Yes, the code made the incorrect assumption that array indices were
> zero-based. I just committed r279445 with a fix so I'm going to assume it
> takes care of these warnings as well as will resolve this as a duplicate.
This problem persists, thus:
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 92952 ***
Re-opened.
