https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93161
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Wesley Shillingford from comment #0)
> However the last line fails to compile with MSVC. After checking the
> standards library support document operator==(strong_ordering,
> strong_ordering) is not mentioned:
> http://wg21.link/p0768
That paper is more than two years old. The current working draft does specify
the equality operators, e.g. [cmp.strongord]
friend constexpr
bool operator==(strong_ordering v, strong_ordering w) noexcept = default;
> Even worse is that value types are not even standardised for comparison
> operators! (thanks Bo Persson):
> http://wg21.link/P1946
That paper was approved two months ago and is part of the current working
draft.
I don't see a libstdc++ bug here.
