https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94443

--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin <li...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bce1c72444bb3c9636b492975a0494b376678cf

commit r9-8507-g7bce1c72444bb3c9636b492975a0494b376678cf
Author: Kewen Lin <li...@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 3 02:10:08 2020 -0500

    Fix PR94443 with gsi_insert_seq_before [PR94443]

    This patch is to fix the stupid mistake by using
    gsi_insert_seq_before instead of gsi_insert_before.

    BTW, the regression testing on one x86_64 machine from CFarm is
    unable to reveal it (I guess due to native arch sandybridge?), so I
    specified additional option -march=znver2 and verified the coverage.

    Bootstrapped/regtested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu (P9) and
    x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, also verified the fail cases in related PRs.

    Backport from mainline.

      2020-04-03  Kewen Lin  <li...@gcc.gnu.org>

      gcc/
          PR tree-optimization/94443
          * tree-vect-loop.c (vectorizable_live_operation): Use
          gsi_insert_seq_before to replace gsi_insert_before.

      gcc/testsuite/
          PR tree-optimization/94443
          * gcc.dg/vect/pr94443.c: New test.

Reply via email to