https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92893
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> --- Isn't this ultimately a case of relying on the type information from that MEM expression in a place where it's not valid?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92893
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> --- Isn't this ultimately a case of relying on the type information from that MEM expression in a place where it's not valid?