https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95726
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #2) > They mangle differently, and e.g.: > > void f(float32x4_t); > void f(V); > > aren't ODR equivalent. But a lot of code relies on the GNU vector > extensions being available for float32x4_t as well as V, and on V > and float32x4_t being mutually and implicitly interconvertible. But if they mangle differently, then structural_comptypes shouldn't treat them as same types.
